This blog represents my own personal point of view.

As you mature emotionally (or mentally, or spiritually), you will grow out of your present way of thinking, and you will eventually come around to mine.

This blog does not necessarily represent the points of view of my associates, friends, dentist, girlfriend, or furniture. If they want a point of view they can get their own.

I do not endorse nor verify the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message posted on this site.

I’m not responsible for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential or any other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused, arising out of or in connection with the use of this blog or in reliance on the Information available on the site, including any personal injury, business interruption, loss of use, lost data, lost profits or any other pecuniary loss, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortuous action, even if I have been informed of the possibility thereof.

If you read this document and a bus happens to drive through your kitchen as a result from any inaccuracy on my part, I shall not be responsible. I will also not accept any responsibility for the postings submitted by others.

Some other things I accept no responsibility for:

Pizzas with unordered anchovies, explicit lyrics on Sean “Pee-Diddle” Comb’s new CD, leaky roofs, broken glass, projectile vomiting, “batteries included”, but weren’t, dogs that bite, the Toronto Maple Leafs, the fact that hot dogs come 12 in a pack and buns only come with 8, or your nagging mother-in-law,

Finally, if rash, irritation, redness, or swelling develops, discontinue reading.

2 thoughts on “Disclaimer

  1. Mr. Watts

    I’m sure you are kept more than busy keeping up with developments in Aurora.
    In a previous life I lived in Thunder Bay ON so every few months I google the local news.
    Thought you might be interested in a parallel situation happening there.

    FYI – population just over 100K

    Proposed new $100M + arena and convention centre

    Editorial claiming the residents have had their chance to speak up

    A rebuttal letter from a resident.

    Eerily similar to the Heritage Theme Park process including the favourable professional study.

    Massive communications Fail by the town or clever bypass of public opposition?

    Who can say?

    1. Thanks for this, there do appear o be parallels one can draw.

      I wasn’t able to get the chroniclejournal links to work, but I will seek them out through my own searches.

      As Clr. Thompson pointed out the favorable professional study tells staff and council exactly what was expected, anything is fessible if you throw money at it.

      The bigger question is why you would even remotely consider throwing money at a scheme devised by a subcomittee of the AHS which has proven itself incapable of managing their own affairs.

      I see this as a massive communications failure by both sides, it just happened to be in favor of those advocating for the park, now the tide seems to be turning.

      More on that in some future posts.

      Thanks again for sharing!

Watts on your mind?

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.